The
look of enchanting beauty or the dull monotony of the interiors of a house
largely depends upon the selection of furniture. The charm of colonial
furniture is a sure-fire choice as it goes well with any kind of colour themes.
Some people still prefer to opt for polyurethane-coated furniture, an
amalgamation of Japanese, Italian and Shaharanpur styles, with floral carving
mounted on curvy moulding.
The
mental outlook of the way of looking as it needs to be changed. The
conventional outlook has been formed by having looked at it for so long and
getting accustomed to it. This has to be changed. In small apartments, a
bedroom cannot be looked upon as a place to just sleep in at night, it also
needs to act as a lounge, an area where one can relax and ged away from the
anguish of big city life. There is a general tendency to ignore lofts,
passages, comers, foyers and corridors. In fact, if enough attention is paid to
these niche areas, they can enhance the appearance of the house.
Most
of the people consider the bathroom to be unimportant and a place simply meant
for the apparent purpose of cleansing, but it is more than that. In actual
reality, it is telltale benchmark of the owner’s eye for detail. Well-placed
mirrors, simple colour schemes, and see-through shower stalls make for an airy,
spacious bathroom. Decorating the bathroom with a false ceiling is an outmoded
practice. Nowadays it is not in vogue.
Recently
a builder was ordered to pay almost eight times the original price of the flat
for his inordinate and unjustified delay in delivering possession to a
purchaser. The judgment of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has
been hailed by consumer activists as a much needed trend to bring much needed
accountability in Realty Sector.
TheState Commission expressed its deep anguish over the exploitation of helplessconsumers by the builders and developers. It viewed the delay and usualpractice of creating a third party interest with utmost seriousness and henceslapped eight times penalty. This case can certainly turn into a trend-setter
and many such cases will now land up in Consumer Disputes-Redressal
Commissions. In the instant case, Prashant Kulkarni had purchased a flat for
Rs.6.5 lakh in Kothrud area ofPune. Here most of the flats are owned by people
from Vidarbha. From Vijay Wagh of Mrunmayee Society in 2001. With possession
promised the same year, consumer had cleared the initial payments, keeping
merely Rs.70,000/- pending to
be paid at the time of possession of the flat. Prashant Kulkarni, in his
complaint has stated that possession was not delivered and the builder created
third party interest. No notice of cancellation of alleged default was served
to him.
Thebuilder claimed that since purchaser had not paid the amount, the agreement wascancelled due to default in payment. As usual the builder claimed that
agreement was not registered and is under Maharashtra Ownership of Flat Act 1983
and hence not maintainable. However, the District Forum also rejected the claim
and contention and directed the builder to hand over possession to the original
purchaser. The State Commission pointed out that though the Forum below hadordered to handover the possession of flat to the consumer, he would notimmediately get the possession as the builder has already created third partyinterest in the flat originally booked by him and parted with the possession infavour of third party.
more : http://www.bangalore5.com
No comments:
Post a Comment